Meeting of Minds: Cross-Generational Conversations About Digital Ethics (Part Two)

You found that adults and teens had different understandings of the identity play which occurs online. Where do these differences come from?

GOODPLAY: In the dialogues, we asked what the participants saw as acceptable, and what they viewed as the risks and benefits of experimenting with and exploring one’s identity online. Both adults and teens cited the ability to test out an “ideal self” as one of the primary benefits of online identity play. The two groups also identified common risks associated with identity play, such as not being true to yourself or becoming disconnected from your offline self.

However, as you note, we did observe differences between adults and teens in their attitudes toward online identity play. In addition to testing out an ideal self, teens mentioned the opportunity to recreate themselves online. Adults, on the other hand, were more likely to celebrate the ability to accentuate existing aspects of their personality. To make sense of this difference, we consider the fact that adolescence is generally regarded as a critical period for identity formation. Adolescents begin for the first time to ask themselves: “Who am I?” While this question is never answered once and for all, identity tends to become more stable as people leave adolescence and enter adulthood. Therefore, it’s perhaps not surprising that the adult participants focused on minor alterations of existing identity elements, whereas teens considered more dramatic self-transformations.

With respect to the perceived risks of online identity play, teens focused to a greater degree than adults on the danger of developing relationships on a false or inauthentic basis. Again, this finding isn’t surprising if we consider its developmental underpinnings. Interpersonal relationships become central during adolescence; it’s in the context of reciprocal, trusting relationships that adolescents explore their identities. The feedback they receive from friends plays an important role in their decisions to highlight certain personal attributes and hide others. It’s likely due to the centrality of peer relationships that our teen participants were more concerned than the adults about building inauthentic friendships online.

Some have argued that the emerging generation cares much less about privacy than preceding generations. Did your research bear out this oft-cited claim?

GOODPLAY: To a certain extent, yes. We found that teens are generally more comfortable sharing their lives online than adults. Teen participants had considerably more to say than adults about the benefits of sharing personal information with others online. Teens discussed the opportunities that the Internet affords them to express themselves freely, to get things off their chests, and to learn about friends and have their friends learn about them. In contrast, adults focused to a greater degree on the privacy concerns related to such self-disclosure. That’s not to say that teens didn’t express any concern about their privacy online. On the contrary, they were quite clear about their desire for privacy from adults!

How so?

Well, consider this quote from one teen participant: “Let me make it clear, for me Facebook is for socialising with my friends and expanding my friend circle and when my parents add me as a friend it really pisses me off so when my dad joined Facebook and added me as a friend I rejected his request that instance because I knew he was doing that to keep a check on me. for Gods sake!!! Parents should let us have our own privacy and not meddle in between as it may hinder the relationship we share.” All joking aside, what sentiments like this point to is that teens aren’t unaware of privacy issues, they simply have different norms when it comes to negotiating them.

Youth are often described as “the Napster generation” and accused of having little respect for intellectual property. What did you discover about the way adults and youth thought about attribution and authorship?

COMMON SENSE MEDIA: This question is interesting because both youth and adults identified how difficult it was to know what constitutes “best practice” given that the norms of the industry are in flux and because of the varying messages that artists convey to the public about how to buy their albums and from where. For instance, there are bands who have allowed customers to download their albums for the amount the customer believes is appropriate, while other bands abhor this practice.

GLOBAL KIDS: We saw both teens and adults actually call for new business models that addressed problems with downloading and made sure that authors got their fair share, while at the same time a majority of youth indeed admitted to downloading, with some being conflicted and some not about doing so. On the other hand, teens seemed quite adamant about both wanting attribution for their own work and about the importance of giving attribution to others when relevant, likely because they’re creating more online remixes/mash-ups etc. than adults.

GOODPLAY: Interestingly, while a lot of teens were adamant about wanting attribution for their own work and giving attribution to others, fewer seemed to connect this to the issue of illegal downloading. When they did talk about the negative aspects of illegal downloading, they mostly worried about the negative consequences to themselves rather than the potential negative effects for the artists.

You cite one young person as saying, “the internet is a way for people to do what they want without getting in trouble.” How characteristic is this of the attitudes displayed by young people in these conversations?

GLOBAL KIDS: Well, I think it’s definitely representative of a certain subset of teens, though certainly not a dominant perspective. As we watched the dialogues progress and then conducted analysis of who said what, we noticed that the youth involved stratified into certain categories of thinking with regards to ethics, some that were more advanced and others less so, as GoodPlay mentioned above. We felt it was important to highlight that this sort of “do what you want without consequence” sort of thinking is indeed there, especially for teens on the younger end of the spectrum. We didn’t want to be alarmist when sharing our results, as there’s been plenty of alarmist rhetoric out there about young people’s participation online, but rather be realistic about the views that exist and the resulting need for adult involvement in these conversations.

What insights did you get from this research which might inform the decisions made by parents? by educators?

COMMON SENSE MEDIA: I think that the biggest takeaway was that adults and teens are truly able to participate in meaningful dialogue about some of the tougher issues that emerge about life online if there’s an honest and open setting to do so. Dialogues like these could be tailored to a variety of settings and could focus on a wide array of issues that might be specific to local needs in a given community. There are a lot of easy to use online tools (out of the box social networks like Ning, free forum and Listserv services, etc.) out there that can allow educators and youth workers to run online dialogues with their school communities during the school year. Increased dialogue online between teens and adults is not only important because the two groups generally inhabit the digital world in very different ways right now, but also because adults provide important guidance in terms of the ethical development of young people. Adults have always played this role in kids’ lives and the more they are educated about talking about the digital aspects of their kids’ lives the better.

GLOBAL KIDS: It’s also important to note that this kind of cross-generational dialogue doesn’t just need to happen online. We found that there are some real advantages to an online context, like a changed power dynamic where youth might feel more confident sharing openly. However, we know that having face to face conversations about these issues is critical whether it’s in the home, in classrooms, in afterschool spaces or in other sorts of youth groups.

GOODPLAY: Actually, Henry, the recent collaboration between your NML team and the GoodPlay team is a great example of a school-based initiative aimed at promoting these types of conversations between adults and youth. The curricular activities that we created together – called Our Space: Being a Responsible Citizen of the Digital World – attempt to engage high school students in a thoughtful examination of the ethical issues that arise online. We hope that these activities will be an effective way for teachers to enter into conversations with youth and scaffold their ethical thinking.

COMMON SENSE MEDIA And by bringing parents into the conversation we can strengthen home-school partnerships to help young people navigate the ethical challenges of the digital world. With the aging down of online life, it’s become imperative to begin these conversations in middle school and so we are working in collaboration with the GoodPlay Project to create a 5th-8th grade digital citizenship curriculum – Digital Literacy: Citizenship in a Connected Culture Check back at www.commonsense.org in late Spring for more information and access to these materials.

Katie Davis is a Project Specialist on several research projects led by Dr. Howard Gardner at Project Zero, including the GoodPlay Project, the Developing Minds and Digital Media Project, and the Trust and Trustworthiness Project. She is also an advanced doctoral student in Human Development and Education at Harvard Graduate School of Education. In recent work, she conducted a study investigating how girls in late adolescence and emerging adulthood use blogging as a way to express and explore their identities. For the Focus Dialogues, Katie and Carrie James, a Research Director and Principal Investigator at Project Zero, developed the framework that informed the dialogues, developed dialogue prompts, and synthesized findings.

Shira Lee Katz is the Digital Media Project Manager at Common Sense Media, where she manages the research and creation of a forthcoming Digital Citizenship curriculum for 5th-8th grade students. She is also a key point person for the Digital Media & Learning grantee network funded by The MacArthur Foundation. Shira holds a doctorate in Human Development and Psychology from Harvard Graduate School of Education. For the Focus Dialogues, Shira and Linda Burch, Common Sense Media’s Chief Education and Strategy Officer, co-conceptualized the project, developed dialogue prompts, recruited adult participants, and produced the final report.

Rafi Santo is a Senior Program Associate in the Online Leadership Program at Global Kids, Inc. Rafi specializes in the design and implementation of educational technology projects and has done work as varied as online youth dialogues, youth advisories focused around digital media, social media civic engagement programs and youth leadership development and peer education in virtual worlds. He has collaborated on projects with many organizations and with MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning grantees to strengthen their initiatives through youth voices and perspectives. Rafi has over 10 years of experience in youth development and education. For the Focus Dialogues, Rafi and Barry Joseph, Director of Global Kids’ Online Leadership Program, conceptualized the project, developed dialogue prompts, recruited teen participants, housed and monitored the dialogues on their website, a wrote the final report.

Comments

  1. towerwindowview.wordpress.com says:

    I think that the discussions make some good points about the comfort level of younger groups to participate in discussion. Is there any good resources to refer someone to on the point made by Common Sense Media? I’ve been doing a lot of work with my state’s Approach to planning services for Transition Aged Youth (defined by our state as 14-25) in regard to involving Youth in planning on higher and broader levels, and I run into far too many individuals in advisory positions who do not get this, but carry disproportionate sway because of an academic background.

    There is real potential for practical application of that point here, as a small group of us is working on taking our State’s Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services advisory and creating an online leg. Unfortunately, some of the individuals involved in the larger advisory are categorically against online involvement, all the while giving lip service to both consumer and Transition aged Youth involvement.

  2. Dear Professor Jenkins,

    I found this entry and its previous companion of great interest. Digital media, specifically the use of the Internet, has created new discourse within the family. While it may be inevitable that generations will ultimately utilize technology differently, I believe the primacy of interpersonal communication regarding technological discourse remains constant. New forms of digital media can expedite communication within the familial unit; however, these newer forms of technology: social media platforms, text messaging, e-mail and twitter, are often used to keep in touch and check-in with family members throughout the course of the day rather than carry out engaging conversations. In your first entry you stress the importance of clear communication and frank exchanges between adults and children as an alternative to youth activity monitoring, ameliorating cross-generational conversation. There appears to be a trend surrounding technological discourse: rather than conversing via new technology, individuals tend to engage in interpersonal dialogue to more clearly articulate and understand one’s use of the technology and its role within the family unit. I would like to know your opinion regarding the evolution of cross-generational communication. It is my belief the majority of parent-child technological relationships are rapidly approaching a crucial turning point. As the Millennial Generation matures to parenthood, adults will be better equipped to bridge the cross-generational gap. A threshold will be reached; parents who grew-up with digital media will be able to better relate to their children’s use of this technology because they too grew up with digital technology, whereas parents of the Millennial Generation grew up with analog technology. The offset created by this divide between analog and digital has only distanced the cross-generational gap in recent years. The fundamental paradigm shift from analog to digital was a drastic technological advancement; however, I do not foresee a shift of similar magnitude during immediate future generations.

    While technology will continue to persist, the foundation of the Internet, social media platforms and other forms of digital and mediated communication will not advance at such an exponential rate as to offset cross-generation communication in the wake of the digital paradigm shift. Do you agree with this hypothesis or do you believe technology will continue to advance too rapidly for such cross-generational overlap? In addition to understanding the multi-generational discourse of emerging media, it is necessary to discuss both the channel of communications used and the type of communications occurring over these channels within the family unit. While different family members may have stronger relationships with social media tools and the mediascape in general, what types of communications occur over these channels? How do generations differ — or do they — in the types of communications they send? Even as the Millennial Generation ages, what paths of communication do these new media tools like Twitter and text messaging really precipitate? While social media tools have been categorized as multi-communication platforms for “bringing people together,” one should also question the one-dimensional nature of these messages — not necessarily the platforms — in such phenomena like Twitter. Do these tweets really serve as a one-way broadcast and are they indeed emblematic of social media as a whole — some distorted identity-creation/consumption space the twenty-first century consumer/user inhabits? Your comments and opinions would be greatly appreciated.

  3. I would like to know your opinion regarding the evolution of cross-generational communication. It is my belief the majority of parent-child technological relationships are rapidly approaching a crucial turning point.

  4. robert dicousta says:

    Your concepts were easy to understand that I wondered why I never looked at it before.Glad to know that there’s an individual out there that definitely understands what he’s discussing.

    chip & pin

  5. robert dicousta says:

    Thank you for your lots information about Meeting of Minds.I’ve never been there before,but you show me how wonderful that place is, through the photos.And also, I really tasted the flavor of this post.

    Free Card Machine

  6. I was looking for information on Game culture as I usually face problems in working on Game culture, so I am happy to find this post very useful for me. These kinds of posts are useful for anyone from beginner to the professional. Thanks for sharing.

    Doble sim

  7. I totally agree with you that many serious hunters are as much into preserving the natural environment as anyone…It was really a good read..

    Trade Show Display

  8. I am truly amazed at your approach…Thanks a lot for providing the website on results..

    cold calling service

  9. perlunya web komunitas event

    perlunya web komunitas event

    visit to my blog ,and thanks you very much for your info

  10. daveharris says:

    Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this website. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s hard to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual appearance. I must say you have done a fantastic job with this. Additionally, the blog loads extremely quick for me on Chrome. Superb Blog!

    Dolce Vita

    Deviled Eggs

    Wild Rice Soup

  11. robert dicousta says:

    I found the perfect place for my needs. Contains the wonderful and useful messages. Keep up the good work.Ultimately,I want to thank you for having a good website.

    maid of honor speech

  12. robert dicousta says:

    This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.I’ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks also!

    funeral eulogy

  13. I found the perfect place for my needs.Attic Conversion Contains wonderful and useful messages. I have read most of them and has a lot of them. Garage Conversion To me, he’s doing the great work.

  14. Nice content, I trust this is a nice blog. Wish to see fresh content next time. 

    Remote Infrastructure Management

  15. swiss replica watches is Melbourne based company and trades purely online. We guarantee the lowest prices for a variety of Swiss replica watches.Replica Watches from wellreplicawatches.com: swiss fake watches, Replica Rolex Watches , Fake Breitling, Replica Tag Heuer, Men’s Watches, Women’s Watches and more.bgrgth

  16. web development says:

    Thanks for the great article. Where else could someone get that information in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I’m looking for that information.Dating

  17. Robinson says:

    It’s good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, thanx now i have the link which i was looking for my research.

    Child Behavior Problems

    Potty Training Boys

    Potty Training Tips

    Potty Training Regression

  18. Highly helpful thank you, There's no doubt that your followers would possibly want significantly better afrika mangosu written articles like that maintain the excellent work.tütüne son klavis panax nanomatik orjin krem