Multitasking and Continuous Partial Attention: An Interview with Linda Stone (Part One)

Many of you know the white paper I and a team of MIT-based researchers wrote for the MacArthur Foundation’s Digital Media and Learning initiative identifying some of the core skills which young people need to acquire if they are going to be able to meaningfully participate in the new media landscape. Perhaps the most controversial skill we included on our list was “multitasking.” We knew that many regard multitasking as a form of distraction which fragments the attention of young people, but we also felt it needed to be seriously considered as a mechanism which allows us to cope with the intense information flow which constitutes our contemporary environment. Our point was that students need to be able to manage their attention, shifting it as needed between modes which involve scanning their environment for meaningful inputs (like a hunter) and focusing closely on a specific domain (like a farmer). I’ve since written on this blog discussing patterns of multitasking I’ve seen from students in my classroom while I was at MIT, further elaborating on my own thinking about multitasking.

Today, I am happy to share with you the thoughts of Linda Stone, who has spent a great deal of time over the past decade reflecting on strategies for managing attention and about the educational consequences of what she has called “continuous partial attention.” I met Stone years ago through the PopTech! conference in Camden, Maine, a great event, and we’ve stayed in touch off and on. In recent times, she’s written some provocative pieces for the Huffington Post about what’s she’s been calling “conscious computing.” Stone has been a top level executive at Apple and has led research at Microsoft on Virtual Worlds. She’s now spending much of her time trying to understand the impact of new media on attention. As she writes on her blog, “Attention is the most powerful tool of the human spirit. We can enhance or augment our attention with practices like meditation and exercise, diffuse it with technologies like email and Blackberries, or alter it with phamaceuticals. In the end, though, we are fully responsible for how we choose to use this extraordinary tool.”

Let’s start with a basic statement. You write, “Personal technologies today are prosthetics for our minds.” In what sense?

For most of us, when we sit at the computer or use a cell phone, our mind is engaged and our body is “hanging out.” Have you ever noticed someone sitting at a computer, body increasingly slumped and computer increasingly animated? Have you found yourself holding your breath or breathing shallowly while you work at the computer. I call that email apnea, temporary cessation of breath or shallow breathing while doing email (or texting). We use the computer to extend our minds, while often, unintentionally, our bodies are being compromised in some way (posture, breathing, even just waiting to use the bathroom until we get yet another email done or another document completed).

You coined the term, “continuous partial attention,” to describe a particular way we interact with each other in a world of mobile technologies. Can you explain this concept? How did your interest in attention emerge from the work you were doing with Microsoft on online communities?

In 1997, I coined the phrase Continuous Partial Attention (Harvard Business Review, January 2007) to describe what I observed in the world around me, at Microsoft where I was a researcher and later a Vice President, with customers, and at NYU where I was adjunct faculty in a graduate program. We all seemed to be paying partial attention – continuously. NYU students had their screens tiled to display multiple instant messaging windows, email, WORD documents, and more. My colleagues in high technology did their best to give the appearance of paying attention to a conversation, all the while, also attending to caller I.D., Tetris and BrickOut on their cell phones, and other people in range. Every stray input was a firefly. And every firefly was examined to determine if it burned more brightly than the one in hand.

As I watched the graduate students at NYU, it occurred to me that they were doing something very different from what I called multi-tasking. These students were hyper alert, ready to respond to any input coming in from any direction. They participated in four I.M. conversations while talking on the phone, responding to email, and noticing who was passing by. In those days, back at the Microsoft campus, many of us worked on two monitors – one monitor displayed email, the other displayed code or a Word document or a spreadsheet. It was no surprise to me when Microsoft’s earliest version of Instant Messenger (I.M.) took up a full screen. An assumption had been made that if a user was I.M.’ing, they wouldn’t choose to browse the net or answer email or prepare a document simultaneously. Digital immigrant thinking.

Digital immigrants at technology companies founded prior to 1990, were beginning to encounter digital natives. Digital immigrants had embraced technology to enhance productivity and personal creativity – PC’s and Macs, word processing and spreadsheets, desktop publishing and paint programs empowered and enabled us. Digital natives took it all a step further. Technology wasn’t just about tasks and productivity. New technologies enabled new types of communication, relationships and personal networks.

I mutli-tasked because I believed it made me more productive. I ate a sandwich while I filed papers. I had an eye on email coming in while I prepared a document. To answer email, I turned my attention to the monitor displaying it and set my document aside, momentarily. I moved between tasks, in rapid sequence, or, if I was doing more than one thing, one of those activities was automatic – like eating a sandwich – it didn’t take much thinking, and one of those activities required some thinking – like answering an email.

My NYU students were hyper alert. They were asking their brains to do something different – they were asking their brains to attend to four I.M. conversations, a partially completed paper, a news website, a text message coming in on the cell phone and a conversation with the person sitting next to them. This blew me away. I wanted to give it a name that more accurately described it. I called it Continuous Partial Attention (cpa).

These students were ahead of the curve. As anywhere, anytime, any place technologies like cell phones, Blackberries, and wi-fi, proliferated, we came to expect immediate responses to email and phone calls, and all began to use cpa as an attention strategy. It was possible to work 24/7 and we did. We took time management classes and refined our ability to create schedules and lists. Untethered technology gives us the freedom to do anything, anywhere, anytime. It also enslaves us. We feel compelled to use it where ever it is.

At Microsoft, when I moved from Microsoft Research to work for Steve Ballmer, I believed I could do everything – both proactive and reactive, and I just made my days longer to accommodate demands.

My colleagues and I struggled with the workload in an effort to stay on top of everything. Mobile devices in hand, we were now all using cpa as our primary attention strategy. And we had even amped that up – often we were continuously paying Continuous Partial Attention (continuous cpa). There was no break in the pace. 24/7, anywhere, anytime, any place.

Widely recognized as a visionary thinker and thought leader, Linda Stone is a writer, speaker and consultant focused on trends and their strategic and consumer implications. Articles on her work have appeared in the New York Times, Newsweek, The Economist, Boston Globe, Harvard Business Review, and hundreds of blogs.

Previously, she spent close to twenty years as an executive in high technology. In 1986, she was persuaded to join Apple Computer to help “change the world.” In her 7 years at Apple, she had the opportunity to do pioneering work in multimedia hardware, software and publishing. In her last year at Apple, Stone worked for Chairman and CEO John Sculley on special projects. In 1993, Stone joined Microsoft Research under Nathan Myhrvold and Rick Rashid. She co-founded and directed the Virtual Worlds Group/Social Computing Group, researching online social life and virtual communities. During this time, she also taught as adjunct faculty in NYU’s prestigious Interactive Telecommunications Program. In 2000, CEO Steve Ballmer tapped Stone to take on a VP role, reporting to him, to help improve industry relationships and contribute to a constructive evolution of the corporate culture. She retired from Microsoft in 2002. She is an advisor for the Pew Internet and American Life Project (www.pewinternet.org) and is on the Advisory Board of the RIT Lab for Social Computing.

Comments

  1. Recent research (from Stanford U.) on the consequences of cpa suggest that despite the user perception that they are more efficient or productive tbe reality seems to be that this isn’t born out. The question at iise is “as measured by what?”, of course. But mearures of recall, concept acquisition, and even short term memory all are apparently diminished when engaging in cpa.

    Multitasking may well provide an advantage to needs associated with peripheral awareness, much like peripheral vision assists to alert and orient foveal vision to catch something in time for it to be recognized as useful, dangerous or inconsequential. Where mounting evidence suggests that this is at the cost of more focused narrative attention the question is do we need to become proactively aware and teach or at least make clear the trade off so individuals (learners) aren’t seduced by a false perception of their performance or capabilities?

    Phil

  2. At a blistering pace of focused absorption, I read your interview with Linda Stone and came away with several questions. She coined the acronym CPA and lived its base lingua continuous partial attention, seemingly ratcheting up of late to CCPA…cpa’s continuum; the constant. It’s a frenetic partially absorbed cerebral lifestyle; does she sleep and eat, other than the occasional sandwich-over-email? More importantly is she contentedly happy with her accomplishments? Or frenetically looking to her next? What? In the fractious employment hunt emanating from the early ’80’s onward, a job interviewer would ask: Why so many jobs? Employers? What happened? Why do you want to work here? For how long will we have you? On the radio earlier a.m. a noted child and family (happiness) Psychologist spoke to the need of our society ratcheting DOWN the multi-sport, multi-music-lesson, multi-dance-athon modus operandi of child-rearing, family happiness, and just working with the open-sourced creativeness of ‘going out and playing’. Apparently, Linda loves what she does, and loves what she works. She has worked her love and loved her work into a lifelong treatise of evidence-based personal research of continuously being in a state of continuous partial attention (CCPA) leading to HLE2E…hello Linda, earth to Linda…are you here? Is this a good thing? Just curious…

  3. I’m in full agreement with multitasking, these days it’s required. You have to talk on the phone, write emails, talk to co-workers and do up a report. It’s not a simple life in terms of tasks assigned. It was much more simple during the times of simple fax/phone lines.

    Without the ability or knowledge of multitasking new pupils in the workplace will find themselves lost in translation at best and fired at worst.

    Bonnie Smith

    COO/Director FXP

    http://www.forexpulse.com

  4. Charlote says:

    The idea of this site particularly for 642-415, color scheme and template is also stunning. I always fascinated in learning graphics, 642-426, web designs and related terms. I hope you would include discussion group in your site soon for 650-393 and graphic designing 312-50.

  5. THis is so great informations. I will come back

    If you have free time, please visit Padded BrasLong Denim Skirts.

    Thanks

  6. I can see that you are putting icnd 640-822 a lot of time and effort into your blog and detailed articles! I am deeply in love with every mcitp 70-642 single piece of information you post here. Will be back often mcts 70-662 to read more updates in future security+ sy0-201 as well.my best wishes for you always so keep it up.regards

  7. adamantiteou.wordpress.com says:

    Multitasking and resistant to stress are two of the most desired skills at least for this decade. It’s no wonder why really… because people want production and they want lots of it… also employees should know a bit of everything or even better know multiple areas and multitask fast between jobs.

    mf global

  8. I’d been obsessed with my free porn videos younger sister’s sex life for almost two years when I finally found the courage and mobile porn the means to take a part in it. In fact, my obsession had probably been developing for quite some time before that without my noticing it free porn tube, my teenage unconscious taking in the form of her developing body, her budding breasts, her pheromones and whatnot since the onset of her puber

    ABB728019395

  9. Louis Vuitton, the world-renowned brands, but also for muxury a consideration. For these replica louis vuitton,replica Louis Vuitton Handbags absolute comw of NPK’s high quality and fashion design, but also added the popular bags for sale. There are also many copies of replica louis vuitton Handbag to sell in the market, so when you choose not to pay attention to your luggage. In addition, all of these Louis Vuitton Handbags,also used the same material,designed by replica louis vuitton of these condescending, and large bags. In short, all of these replica Louis Vuitton Handbags to provide you with the replica louis vuitton Handbag and so on. Speaking of Louis Vuitton Handbags,people know, talk, and only those women who use this wealth of high-priced bags. In the winter, it is said, the work of louis vuitton travel luggage and louis vuitton men bags in these cities on the market very well.

    CHEN