How Can We Understand Code as a “Critical Artifact”?: USC’s Mark Marino on Critical Code Studies (Part One)

The Humanities and Critical Code Studies (HaCCS) Lab opened this summer at the University of Southern California with the specific goal of developing the field and fostering discussion between the Humanities and Computer Science. Current members include USC faculty and students and a host of affiliated scholars from other institutions, including and international advisory board. The HaCCS Lab sponsored its first conference this summer and will be sponsoring other get togethers both on campus and online. Central to its mission is to develop common vocabularies, methodologies, and case-studies of CCS, while promoting publications in the field.

Mark Marino, who teaches in the USC Writing Program, is the Director of the new center. He was nice enough to agree to an interview during which he explains what he means by Critical Code Studies, how it relates to other humanistic approaches to studying digital culture, and what he thinks it contributes to our understanding of Code as a cultural practice and as a critical artifact.


What do you mean by critical code studies?

 

The working definition for Critical Code Studies (CCS) is “the application of humanities style hermeneutics to the interpretation of computer source code.”  However, lately, I have found it more useful to explain the field to people as the analysis of technoculture (culture as imbricated with technology) through the entry point of the source code of a particular digital object. The code is not the ends of the analyses, but the beginning.

Critical Code Studies finds code meaningful not as text but “as a text,” an artifact of a digital moment, full of hooks for discussing digital culture and programming communities. I should note that Critical Code Studies also looks at code separated from functioning software as in the case of some codework poetry, such as Mez’s work or Zach Blas’ trasnCoder anti-programming language. To that extent, Critical Code Studies is also interested in the culture of code, the art of code, and code in culture more broadly.

At this nascent stage, I also find it useful to point out the plurality and variability of the methodologies that have been already used to analyze code whether in the Critical Code Studies Working Group, at our two conferences, in the HASTAC Scholars Forum, at MLA, and elsewhere. These preliminary readings demonstrate that Critical Code Studies is not an approach but a wide range of approaches that use code as a starting point for a larger discussion. Scholars seem eager to talk about code and are experimenting with ways to unpack it.

Critical Code Studies answers a call from N. Katherine Hayles and others for media specific analysis by taking up for analysis an aspect of digital objects that is unique to the computational realm. Back in 2005 and 2006 when I first began talking to people about code, there weren’t many examples of critics, working then under the title “new media,” who discussed code, which struck me as unusual since it’s such a rich semiotic realm. There just weren’t enough critical readings that demonstrated for how to talk about that component of the work. At the time, I was working on my dissertation and was trying to produce readings of conversation agents, or chatbots. That led me to write that initial essay in electronic book review.

For my work, the “critical” component is also crucial because it evokes “critical theory.” I don’t want to limit the types of theory or philosophy that can be applied to code, but I do want to push for critiques that challenge, that remain sensitive to the socio-historic contexts of the code, the institutional investments, the ideologies and ontologies of code. Code is already studied in the contexts of computer science, while the humanities have something unique to offer in the form of critical analysis and explication or, if you will, exegesis.


Your published definition of the field stresses the “extra-functional significance” of code. Why separate out meaning from effect? Why not study the relationship between significance and function?

 

The “extra” in “extra-functional” does not mean “outside of” or “beyond” but rather “growing out from.”  Function is certainly an important component of the way code signifies, but it is important to distinguish CCS from the study of code that concentrates primarily on function.  Perhaps more important to this moment of CCS is to discuss the difference between an interpretive approach that seeks implications and meaning rather than a utilitarian approach that is primarily concerned with making code function. Again, while I agree with you that the two aspects are inseparable, the search for meaning goes beyond denotation into the connotations, resonance, implication, evocation, et cetera.

 
How much technical skill and knowledge is required to look at code critically?  Is this a potential space for collaboration between the humanities and the technical fields?

It is the contention of CCS and the newly formed Humanities and Critical Code Studies lab that everyone should have at least some literacy in how code works, whether at a base-level understanding of algorithms, some basic knowledge of programming principals, and/or a basic ability to parse code in whatever language.  That said, the HaCCS lab is working to foster dialogue and collaboration between the Humanities and Computer Science scholars because more engaged critical readings come from the fullest understanding of the culture out of which that code emanates.  Without that dialogue, CCS could become a kind of imperialist project, subject to the same kinds of over-writing, misinterpretation, and misreading that such relationships engender.

In my own readings, I tend to engage in lengthy discussions with programmers, including the authors of the code, so that I can get a more nuanced understanding of how they perceive the code. Again, part of what I’m after are the layers of meaning that code has as it circulates through different discourse communities in different contexts. I look forward to courses in Critical Code Studies co-taught by Humanities and Computer Science faculty to students from across the university looking at code together using the lenses from all their disciplines.

At the same time, CCS tends to attract the programmer-scholar, the hacker-theorist, critics who build things. Being versant in both programming and critical theory helps these critics to apply the theoretical approaches without doing violence or overwriting the ways in which coding conventions are understood within programming circles.

 

Is the goal to develop an “aesthetics” of “good code”? Is critical code studies a kind of formalism?

 

No, Critical Code Studies is not primarily focused on “good code,” although the discussions of the aesthetics of code or Don Knuth’s formulation of  “beautiful code” offer an opening for a conversation that will be familiar to Humanities scholars, namely who defines the aesthetics of beautiful code, why have they chosen this criteria, and what alternatives have been surpassed.  Such discussions often turn to programming anomalies such as the obfuscated code contests. Nonetheless, the discussion of aesthetics makes a fundamental notion of CCS clear: code is not a pure, inevitable formulation.  As Knuth said in his Turing Award lecture, programming is an art. 

 

As to the second question, Critical Code Studies is not formalist, but instead requires a deeply contextualized reading.  On one of the earliest pages we published on CriticalCodeStudies.com, you will find a list of ways to read code that includes reading code against the factors of its creation, it funding source, its composer’s work, its implementation and circulation in cultural as well as material contexts such as the platforms on which it operated, and the other code with which it interacts.    Critical Code Studies focuses on examining the code in its historical moment to better understand the culture out of which it developed. 

Bio:

Mark Marino is the Director of the newly launched Humanities and Critical Code Studies (HaCCS) Lab at USC, named for a field he initiated in 2006. He is the Director of Communication for the Electronic Literature Organization (http://eliterature.org), as well as a writer and critic of experimental interactive forms, including “a show of hands” (http://hands.literatronica.net) and the LA Flood Project. He blogs at Writer Response Theory and is Editor of Bunk Magazine, an online humor zine. He currently teaches for the Writing Program at USC. He is currently working on two collaborative book projects using CCS methodologies. His portfolio can be found here.

Comments

  1. I would hope that Critical Code Studies illuminates the role and importance of protocols, procedures, and functions over instructions and rules.

  2. Reading this put the word “hermeneutics” in my language pathway, just as the word “metacognition” sparked my interest some years ago, because it seemed absolutely logical that thinking about thinking is a great thoughtful pursuit.

    The meaning of the term is pretty straightforward, but the act of making that practical, as a process or discovery – that deserves my personal consideration.

    I can see the value of Mark Marino's focus on Critical Code Studies as much as I appreciate Douglas Rushkoff's “Program or be Programmed”. The value is the practical reality of appreciating code as a culture, which means that code becomes more than a language, like French, but it goes deeper into what that culture means or contributes i.e. it is a different thing entirely to being French than speaking French.

    It is also much more practical for me to wrap my head around the rise of code as the weaving phenomena of modern reality, than it is to look at the broader realm of culture, which Clotaire Rapaille examines in “The Culture Code”.

    I personally find the culture of code far more interesting a proposition than to isolate the code of culture itself. I want to discern what is alchemy and what is chemistry, and it is code which is creating the foundation of a 21st Century culture – whereas to understand the culture code, it spans the centuries.

    What I see Mark Marino focusing or drawing out here is a third aspect which isn't the program or the programmed, but the cultural transformation that is interesting in its own right, that can (as I see it) provide a different way of seeing the end-to-end of programming or programmed culture.

    I see it way more than the history of computing or programming, because of the direct relevance to my own way of life. The moment I read this article, it felt like I had opened the door to something new.

    [Em]
    “emeri gent” @thoughtspaces

  3. Barry, Can you write a bit more about the distinction you're drawing and how you see it impacting the interpretation of digital object through code?

    Emeri Gent, I enjoyed your response, but I can't tell who or what you are? Are you a Twitter meme? A researcher? A collective?

  4. I am an artifact of a digital moment. That moment being a riff, I guess.

    I am glad you enjoyed the response, I enjoyed writing it. The key for me is the latter, not a meme or a research phenomena or a collective thing. Just someone who likes transforming immediate thoughts into something digitally coherent. (Or at least whenever my fingers are in line with mind).

    Since “emeri gent” equals emergence, that is one important part of doing my own thing. The whole point of emergence is that things emerge. When I write I don't have any idea what the next paragraph is going to contain, I just wing it and in so doing, hopefully produce a transcription of original thought.

    Not that I claim to be an original thinker – maybe I am a product of the meme's that I come across, but the only way I know which bit is pure me and which bits are emulations or regurgitation of things I have heard or seen, but that can only come from inspecting what ever it is that I have left behind, at least once my fingers stop typing and this transmission is complete.

    Of course none of this is possible if a piece of code or an interface between my fingers and the final digital encoding on Henry Jenkin's blog did not enable this. So in a manner of speaking, is it really me that is sitting in byte form or is just a digitally rendered copy of how I think out aloud?

    The value for me isn't what gets written but how it shapes what I think. At least I know I am not a bar of a soap, something that sits on the shelf of consumable thought. If people want thought, there is plenty of dead authors who have filled our world with brilliant stuff, but I want to think as I write.

    The trouble with dead authors is that they can't do the thinking for me. I can ask Aristotle what he thinks, but I find it difficult to figure out most things without figuring out how one communicates with the after-life.

    What I do know is that what you are doing in your classes is original work, and more importantly it is relevant work. I watched a documentary today about the influence of Edward Bernays on consumer culture.

    Bernays is another one of those brilliant dead people, I referred to in my prior paragraph – so the value of your class and work as I see it, is an examination of culture of living people, done by the living.

    That is for me the essential aspect of digital existence i.e. that even if a bot can write this (which of course is the dream of artificial intelligence) the cultural aspect of this digital dimension requires us to be very much alive.

    For me to be very much alive, requires me to do more than just my own thing, it requires the capacity to find interesting spaces where I have time to think.

    Why do I need this time to think? Because I enjoy it. Just as you enjoyed reading what I wrote, it is way more important to me that I enjoy writing it. Then that should hopefully answer what I am. A thinker of my own thoughts.

    Do I need to be anything more than that?

    If not, then I will figure out a way that I might in the future live up to other people's expectations. I certainly hope and pray that it is not :-)

    My humble regards and of course also apologies if my etiquette is inadequate.

    [Em]

  5. Such an outstanding Tory Burch Outlet. And an exceptional info is normally upcoming for your needs boys in which are in love with Emu Tory Burch Sale! Emu saleup to make sure you 50%, considering the fact that you purchase couple of sets about Tory Burch Athletic shoes, awesome increased trinkets would be obtainable. Now i'm not likely kidding, Tory Burch Flats you may see all of the data approximately entertainment Emu eliminate as soon as you look Emu sales agreement on the Word wide web. You'll certainly take care of increased fix even if.
    tory burch bags A lot of internet businesses relating to options will probably suitably have a succeed to make sure you enterprise you will hit besides Tory Burch 1872 Women’s Bailey Button in the software Krinkle Chestnut as with individuals have a succeed to make sure you enterprise faux tory burch boots.

  6. I accept and agree with your suggestion.

  7. The winter is comming,have you prepared to pass the winter,I think a Moncler Jacket is necessaery,Online Moncler is a good way to get a perfect Moncler Jackets way,Moncler Jacket is famous of it amazing qulity and it's consummate manual work,when you ware it,you will feel warm,whatere how cold the winter is,moncler can take care of your body.Our Online Moncler Shop
    afford latest Moncler Coat,Moncler Vest,so in the cold winter you can also fashion and attractive,so visit our Moncler Online Shop,it will take you a warm winter.

  8. good

  9. Timberland says:

    I have felt timberland waterproof boots was my duty to persevere — to make every possible effort to complete the term of office to which you elected me. In the past few days, however, it has become evident to me that timberland boots uk no longer have a strong enough political base in the Congress to justify continuing that effort. As long as there was such a base, I felt strongly that timberland work boots was necessary to see the constitutional process through to its conclusion; that to do otherwise would be unfaithful to the spirit of that womens timberland boots deliberately difficult process, and a dangerously destabilizing precedent for the future. But with the disappearance of that base, I now believe that the constitutional timberland kids boots has been served. And there is no longer a need for the process to be prolonged. I would have preferred to carry through to the finish whatever the personal agony discount timberland boots would have involved, and my family unanimously urged me to do so. But the interests of the nation must always come before any personal considerations. From the discussions cheap timberland boots have had with Congressional and other leaders I have concluded that because of the Watergate matter I might not have the support of the Congress that timberland pro boots would consider necessary to back the very difficult decisions and carry out the duties of this office in the way the interests of timberland 6-inch premium boots will require. America needs a full-time President and a full-time Congress, particularly at this time with problems we face at home and abroad. To continue to fight through the months ahead for my personal timberland classic boots would almost totally absorb the time and attention of both the President and the Congress in a period when our timberland hiking boots focus should be on the great issues of peace abroad and prosperity without inflation at home. LJP

    <img alt=”Timberland Men's Classic 3-Eye Lug Handsewn-Burgundy” border=”0″ src=”http://www.timberland1973.com/PicImages/Men's%20Timberland%20Classic%203-Eye%20Handsewn/Men's%20Classic%203-Eye%20Lug%20Handsewn-Burgundy.jpg”>

    timberland on sale

    timberland leisure shoes

    timberland pro work boots

  10. Thanks so much for the great post, i really enjoy reading all your posts and have almost inspired to make a blog myself.

    Keep up the work!

  11. chat Master says:

    شات , الشات , ايجى , مصر , بنات , مصريه , بنوته , ست , ستات , الستات , دردشه , بنت , مصرى , ايجبت , ايجبتى , شات ايجى , شات ايجى بنات , دردشه ايجى بنات , شات مصرى , دردشه مصريه , شات مصر, الشات المصرى , شات بنات , شات ست ستات , شات ست الستات , رومنسيه , شات بنات الرومنسيه , دردشه بنات , شات بنات مصر , دردشه بنات مصر , مصريات , شات المصريين , شات مصريه , شات بنت مصر, شات بنت مصريه , شات بنات كايروشات بنت , شات ستات , شات مصراوى , شات الجيزة , دردشه الجيزة , شات القاهرة , دردشه القاهرة , شات الاسكندريه , دردشه الاسكندريه , شات الاقصر , دردشه الاقصر , شات المنصورة , دردشه المنصورة , شات بورسعيد , دردشه بورسعيد , شات دمياط, دردشه دمياط , شات كفر الشيخ , دردشه كفر الشيخ , شات البحيرة , دردشه البحيرة , شات المنيا , دردشه المنيا
    شات قنا , دردشه قنا , شات سوهاج , دردشه سوهاج , شات الوادى الجديد , دردشه الوادى الجديد , شات شمال سيناء , دردشه شمال سيناء ,شات الفيوم , دردشه الفيوم , شات بنى سويف , دردشه بنى سويف ,شات جنوب سيناء , دردشه جنوب سيناء , شات البحر الاحمر , دردشه البحر الاحمر , شات الاسماعيليه , دردشه الاسماعيليه  , شات اسيوط , دردشه اسيوط , شات الشرقيه , دردشه الشرقيه , شات السويس , دردشه السويس , شات القليوبيه , دردشه القليوبيه , شات المنوفيه , دردشه المنوفيه , شات اسوان , دردشه اسوان , شات الغربيه , دردشه الغربيه , شات الدقهلية , دردشه الدقهليه

    chat , chat masry , chat egy , chat msr , chat msryh , drdsha ,chat egypt,chat girls , chat romancy , chat masry ,
    chat girl,chat bannat ,chat love , chat egy6girls ,chating

  12. hairstyles
    hairstyles are a primitive one and often linked with the popular and demanding styles in 60s and 70s both in men and women. A parallel hairstyles approach is still followed for girls and women in modern
    amazing hairstyle with a little untidy that confers a rock & roll look to your hair. This shag style has gone through slight changes over the time. Unlikely to older styles

    bridal hairstyles